About marriage '08 - III: Children | Harald grit tanks
I have already, in the previous two posts about the new marriage law, concluded that marriages between gays is a nice complement to the diversity of the institution of marriage already exhibit. Now it's time to build a bit more critical perspectives on the new marriage law: it applies kids.
Registered partnership differs from marriage by the parties in a registered partnership are not entitled to assisted reproductive technologies are not able to be considered as adoptive parents are not automatically considered medforelder, legal parent, the partner's biological children at birth as a man in a marriage becomes. (Source)
Okay summarized we can thus say that apart from the actual term partnership / marriage is the aspect ratio of children who have constituted differences births deaths and marriages nsw in regulatory control of gays and heterosexual relationships. I have already discussed this with words and names and designations of very many words in my previous post, so we can leave out here. But the question of the children's room in a gay relationship is worth a separate blog post.
Let it be said at once: this with gays and children is a fairly complicated area. There is no benefit that you just "cut through" and presents simple yes-or-no answer as absolute solution options. Reality is always complex, births deaths and marriages nsw and in this area even more complex than in most others.
Gays can not have children by natural method. It just does. But of course everything is not said about it. Also not all heterosexual couples can have children together. In the heteronorme society we have become accustomed to it as alternative solutions births deaths and marriages nsw - solutions that certainly needed births deaths and marriages nsw to be experienced as something inferior. Straight Looking couples who can not have children together can have children together through adoption or assisted reproduction, in the latter case, either births deaths and marriages nsw using their own genetic material, or using an "external" donor. We have a normal arrangement, and when it is not sufficient, we make adjustments to construct analogous situations, situations in everyday life appear to be identical and equal to the situation that was initially.
We also know that one does not need to be adopted or be donor children to grow up outside the "natural" biological relationship you have been to. There are many children who grow up with one parent or with a stepmother or stepfather living together with their biological mother or father in a heterosexual births deaths and marriages nsw relationship. Yes, these days is it actually as common to live with a stepfather births deaths and marriages nsw or mom's new boyfriend births deaths and marriages nsw or dad's new lady or whatever it's births deaths and marriages nsw called that their mom and dad. Sometimes my mom died, sometimes unknown dad, sometimes my mom has gone away, sometimes my dad has been awarded a single births deaths and marriages nsw parent legally births deaths and marriages nsw entitled. There are many varieties, almost as many variations as there are children. Verily, verily, this is how the singer says:
Children births deaths and marriages nsw are basically a weak party to rain. It is therefore an important social task to strengthen the rights of children, regardless of how the adults around them have chosen to organize its more or less messy relationship. This has been partly done by providing for stepchild adoption so that a loss of one of the two biological parents who have the daily responsibility does not lead to a surviving child be separated births deaths and marriages nsw from the person who has become its second regular caregiver. Exactly what conditions must be present births deaths and marriages nsw for such adoption must be going through, I have not quite clear to me, but I understand that such a solution is not necessarily relevant in a situation where the starting point is that two parents do not live together have joint custody or where the other biological parent than one who has custody, after all, has acknowledged his parenthood. You "do not" a child from one parent, but you have the option to "replace" a lost or non-involved parent with a new one.
So this is basically: We have a starting point, one primordial form, with one mother, one father and one child who live together in a single device. And then we have a myriad of varieties. The question that arises in connection with the new marriage law is how many new varieties we are opening to recognize and regulate as "established normal variants", if one may use such an expression.
The situation is already the many who live in gays couples actually have children. How they have managed to acquire such children without compromising their own identity is of course a matter for them. Some are bisexual. Some have gone abroad and been assisted reproduction. Some have survived births deaths and marriages nsw "against nature" for a time. Neither here goes reality on a simple formula.
These children therefore exist and whose parents live in a homo
I have already, in the previous two posts about the new marriage law, concluded that marriages between gays is a nice complement to the diversity of the institution of marriage already exhibit. Now it's time to build a bit more critical perspectives on the new marriage law: it applies kids.
Registered partnership differs from marriage by the parties in a registered partnership are not entitled to assisted reproductive technologies are not able to be considered as adoptive parents are not automatically considered medforelder, legal parent, the partner's biological children at birth as a man in a marriage becomes. (Source)
Okay summarized we can thus say that apart from the actual term partnership / marriage is the aspect ratio of children who have constituted differences births deaths and marriages nsw in regulatory control of gays and heterosexual relationships. I have already discussed this with words and names and designations of very many words in my previous post, so we can leave out here. But the question of the children's room in a gay relationship is worth a separate blog post.
Let it be said at once: this with gays and children is a fairly complicated area. There is no benefit that you just "cut through" and presents simple yes-or-no answer as absolute solution options. Reality is always complex, births deaths and marriages nsw and in this area even more complex than in most others.
Gays can not have children by natural method. It just does. But of course everything is not said about it. Also not all heterosexual couples can have children together. In the heteronorme society we have become accustomed to it as alternative solutions births deaths and marriages nsw - solutions that certainly needed births deaths and marriages nsw to be experienced as something inferior. Straight Looking couples who can not have children together can have children together through adoption or assisted reproduction, in the latter case, either births deaths and marriages nsw using their own genetic material, or using an "external" donor. We have a normal arrangement, and when it is not sufficient, we make adjustments to construct analogous situations, situations in everyday life appear to be identical and equal to the situation that was initially.
We also know that one does not need to be adopted or be donor children to grow up outside the "natural" biological relationship you have been to. There are many children who grow up with one parent or with a stepmother or stepfather living together with their biological mother or father in a heterosexual births deaths and marriages nsw relationship. Yes, these days is it actually as common to live with a stepfather births deaths and marriages nsw or mom's new boyfriend births deaths and marriages nsw or dad's new lady or whatever it's births deaths and marriages nsw called that their mom and dad. Sometimes my mom died, sometimes unknown dad, sometimes my mom has gone away, sometimes my dad has been awarded a single births deaths and marriages nsw parent legally births deaths and marriages nsw entitled. There are many varieties, almost as many variations as there are children. Verily, verily, this is how the singer says:
Children births deaths and marriages nsw are basically a weak party to rain. It is therefore an important social task to strengthen the rights of children, regardless of how the adults around them have chosen to organize its more or less messy relationship. This has been partly done by providing for stepchild adoption so that a loss of one of the two biological parents who have the daily responsibility does not lead to a surviving child be separated births deaths and marriages nsw from the person who has become its second regular caregiver. Exactly what conditions must be present births deaths and marriages nsw for such adoption must be going through, I have not quite clear to me, but I understand that such a solution is not necessarily relevant in a situation where the starting point is that two parents do not live together have joint custody or where the other biological parent than one who has custody, after all, has acknowledged his parenthood. You "do not" a child from one parent, but you have the option to "replace" a lost or non-involved parent with a new one.
So this is basically: We have a starting point, one primordial form, with one mother, one father and one child who live together in a single device. And then we have a myriad of varieties. The question that arises in connection with the new marriage law is how many new varieties we are opening to recognize and regulate as "established normal variants", if one may use such an expression.
The situation is already the many who live in gays couples actually have children. How they have managed to acquire such children without compromising their own identity is of course a matter for them. Some are bisexual. Some have gone abroad and been assisted reproduction. Some have survived births deaths and marriages nsw "against nature" for a time. Neither here goes reality on a simple formula.
These children therefore exist and whose parents live in a homo
No comments:
Post a Comment